Independent Intervention

Monitoring the police, parades and public order


The following publication has been contributed by Democratic Dialogue. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the members of the kok体育官方app下载 Project. The kok体育官方app下载 Project would welcome other material which meets our guidelines for contributions.
Independent Intervention

Independent Intervention
Monitoring the police, parades and public order
Report No. 12

by Dominic Bryan and Neil Jarman for Democratic Dialogue (1999)

ISBN 1 900281 11 2 Paperback 74pp

Orders to:

Local bookshops, or
{external_link}
53 University Street
Belfast
BT7 1FY


This publication is copyright Democratic Dialogue 1999 and is included on this site by permission of the publisher. You may not edit, adapt, or redistribute changed versions of this for other than your personal use without the express written permission of the publisher, Democratic Dialogue. Redistribution for commercial purposes is not permitted.


Democratic Dialogue
Report 12
August 1999

Democratic Dialogue
53 University Street
Belfast BT7 1FY
Tel: 028-90220050
Fax: 028-9022005 1
E-mail: info@democraticdialogue.org
Web site:

Community Development Centre, North Belfast
22 Cliftonville Road
Belfast BT14 6JX
Tel: 028-90284400
Fax: 028-90284401
E-mail: info.nbcdc@cinni.org

© Democratic Dialogue/CDC 1999 ISBN 1 900281 11 2
Printed by Regency Press


Contents

Preface

1. Introduction

Parade disputes

 

Civil intervention

2. What is a monitor?

 

Observing and monitoring

 

The role of monitors

 

The validity of observations

3. International approaches to monitoring

 

International monitoring of elections

 

Domestic monitoring groups

 

England: Sheffield Policewatch

 

USA: National Lawyers Guild

 

South Africa: monitoring of demonstrations

 

Summary

4. Monitoring in Northern Ireland

 

Monitoring during the 憈roubles

5. Monitoring human rights

 

Human rights and parade disputes

 

Solidarity monitors

 

Summary

6. Monitoring public order

 

Mediators

 

Community-based activity

 

Summary

7. Stewarding public events

 

Purpose and responsibilities

 

The role of stewards

 

Some case studies

 

Stewarding in Northern Ireland

 

Apprentice Boys of Derry: Steward Training Project

8. Future monitoring

 

Developing monitoring

 

Recommendations

Groups involved in monitoring

References


Preface

This is the 12th report from Democratic Dialogue and is a co-production with the Community Development Centre, North Belfast. This is also the seventh in a series of reports on the parades disputes and public-order issues written by Dominic Bryan and Neil Jarman since 1995 and published by DD, CDC and the Centre for the Study of Conflict at the University of Ulster in Coleraine. The other reports are:

Political Rituals: Loyalist Parades in Portadown Centre for the Study of Conflict, 1995.

Parade and Protest: A Discussion of Parading Disputes in Northern Ireland, Centre for the Study of Conflict, 1996.

On The Edge: Community Perspectives on the Civil Disturbances in North Belfast, June-September 1996, CDC, 1997.

Politics in Public: Freedom of Assembly and the Right to Protest - A Comparative Analysis, DD, 1998.

From Riots to Rights: Nationalist Parades in the North of Ireland, Centre for the Study of Conflict, 1998.

Drawing Back from the Edge: Community Based Responses to Violence in North Belfast, CDC, 1999.

This latest report looks at the role that members of civil society have played, and continue to play, at the numerous disputes over contentious parade routes and focuses on the work of human-rights groups, community activists and stewards. The report is based on observation at numerous parades and on formal and informal interviews with people involved in monitoring and with members of the groups we discuss. However, the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the authors alone.

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial assistance given by the Central Community Relations Unit and the Parades Commission towards the research for this report. The publication costs have been supported by the Community Relations Council. Further copies are available from Democratic Dialogue or the Community Development Centre at the addresses on the inside front cover.

Anyone wishing to be kept informed of DD projects and publications should contact the office, so that they can be added to the mailing list, or consult the web site.

 


1. Introduction

Over the past five years disputes over the right to parade have brought public-order issues to the fore in Northern Ireland. The disputes have been inseparably entwined with attempts to move from conflict to peace and have on occasion threatened to undermine the peace process and disrupt the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement. During this period a range of groups have taken it upon themselves to intervene, to try to reduce the likelihood of conflict or violence, by monitoring the behaviour of one or more of the kok体育官方app下载 actors.

Parade disputes

Over the past two hundred years parades have frequently been the focus of disputes in the north of Ireland, but they have become particularly significant at times of political transition. Their current role as a site for public political confrontation began after the paramilitary ceasefires were called in 1994. Residents groups appeared in a number of areas to oppose Orange parades and drew support from a cross-section of the nationalist community, as the ceasefires made it easier for new political alliances to be forged. Disputes have persisted and intensified over the past four years. The marching orders refused attempts at dialogue or any suggestion of compromise over their 憈raditional parade routes. At the same time the Royal Ulster Constabulary became less willing to continue its historic role of protecting Orange parades and increasingly stopped them.

The return route of the Orange Order parade in Portadown in early July, from Drumcree Church back into the Co Armagh town along the Garvaghy Road, has come to symbolise the complexity of these disputes and illustrates the difficulty of finding a broadly acceptable solution. In 1996, when the parade was stopped by the RUC, there were widespread public protests, rioting and violence in loyalist areas. When the parade was eventually forced through, there was extensive violence in nationalist areas. In 1997 the police again forced the parade through after violently forcing residents off the road. The following year saw more violent protests when the Parades Commission issued a determination stopping the Orangemen from taking their 憈raditional route along the Garvaghy Road. Protests continued throughout the year.

Many other Orange parades have been blocked or rerouted over the past four years. Some of these disputes have also ended in violence. The parade along the Garvaghy Road was once again stopped by the Parades Commission in July 1999 but this year the protests have been more muted. We believe that the presence of a variety of monitors - observers, community activists and stewards - has contributed to the more peaceful range of protests witnessed in the past two years.

Civil intervention

A number of groups from within civil society have attempted to contribute to a resolution of the parade disputes by observing and monitoring events and intervening where appropriate. Monitoring has become something of a growth industry and a diverse and varied one at that. The monitoring groups express a range of aims, ideals, practices and aspirations. Some have focused their attention on the role of the police and the potential for the abuse of human rights. Some groups maintain a neutral, independent and impartial stance; others have expressed support for one party; still others utilise monitors clearly identified with one party. Some monitors remain in the background at the event, quietly observing the flow of action and taking notes that will form the basis of a report; others see their role as mediators and are prepared to intervene to reduce the likelihood of trouble. Some monitors are highly visible; others do not stand out from the crowd. Some monitor in large groups; others work in pairs or sometimes alone. Some are local; others have travelled from as far afield as the USA. In this report we try to unravel the bewildering complexity of monitoring groups and the diversity of their approaches, aims and practices.

We begin by establishing the theoretical contexts and exploring approaches to monitoring (chapter 2). We then review examples of monitoring in a variety of jurisdictions and circumstances which we feel we provide useful comparative material (chapter 3). We then turn to the local experience, discussing the background to monitoring in Northern Ireland and reviewing the main organisations involved (chapters 5, 6 and 7). We conclude with a range of recommendations for developing good practice and extending the role of monitors (chapter 8).

While monitoring is a relatively common practice, it is poorly theorised and Many of the groups that decide, or need, to undertake monitoring, end up in some way 憆e-inventing the wheel: process, method, framework and practice are usually created from scratch rather than by drawing on experience. We hope, therefore, that this report will provide a useful starting point for generating ideas about the wider role monitors could play in Northern Ireland.

[Report Contents] [List of Reports]

{external_link}
53 University Street, Belfast, BT7 1FY Northern Ireland
Phone: -44-28-9022-0050 Fax: -44-28-9022-0051
E-mail:
info@democraticdialogue.org

Back to the top of this page